Home Trading ETFs Spiders And QQQ ETFs Set New Highs As Diamonds Lag

Spiders And QQQ ETFs Set New Highs As Diamonds Lag

by TradingETFs.com
IWM: Small Caps Are Not The Ideal Shelter From Trade Tensions - iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA:IWM)

[ad_1]

Despite new all-time highs for the Spiders and QQQ ETFs, the technical dynamics remain the same. Diamonds, Spiders and QQQ have positive but overbought weekly charts, while transports and Russell 2000 have positive weekly charts.

The five ETFs straddle semiannual pivots. Spiders, QQQ, transports and Russell 2000 are above semiannual pivots while Diamonds is not.

The five ETFs also straddle annual pivots. Diamonds, Spiders and QQQ are above, transports and Russel 2000 ETFs are below.

Here’s Today’s Scorecard

Scorecard For The Five Equity ETFs

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSEARCA:DIA)

Daily Chart For DiamondsCourtesy of Refinitiv XENITH

The Diamonds ETF is 25.3% above its 2018 low of $216.97 set on Dec. 26 and set its all-time intraday high of $273.99 on July 16. Diamonds is well above its 200-day simple moving average at $255.28.

Diamonds has a positive but overbought weekly chart with the ETF above its five-week modified moving average at $267.47 with its 12x3x3 weekly slow stochastic reading rising to 88.72 last week, up from 85.97 on July 19. Monthly and annual value levels are $260.59 and $257.94, respectively, with its semiannual pivot at $272.78 and quarterly risky level at $285.35.

SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY)

Daily Chart For SpidersCourtesy of Refinitiv XENITH

The Spiders ETF is 28.9% above its Dec. 26 low of $233.76 and set its all-time intraday high of $302.23 on July 26. Spiders is above its 200-day simple moving average at $278.20.

The weekly chart for Spiders is positive but overbought with the ETF above its five-week MMA at $295.12 with its 12x3x3 weekly slow stochastic reading rising to 89.21 last week, up from 86.34 on July 19. Monthly and annual value levels are $287.60 and $285.86, respectively, with a semiannual pivot at $294.72 and a quarterly risky level at $305.22.

Invesco QQQ ETF (NASDAQ:QQQ)

Daily Chart For QQQCourtesy of Refinitiv XENITH

The QQQ ETF is 36.1% above its 2018 low of $143.46 set on Dec. 24 and set its all-time intraday high of $195.55 on July 26. QQQ is well above its 200-day simple moving average at $175.18.

The weekly chart for QQQ is positive but overbought with the ETF above its five-week MMA at $189.14 with its 12x3x3 weekly slow stochastic reading rising to 87.74 last week, up from 83.90 on July 19. Monthly and annual value levels are $181.65 and $169.27, respectively, with a semiannual pivot at $188.63 and a quarterly risky level at $201.51.

iShares Transportation Average ETF (NYSEARCA:IYT)

daily Chart For IYTCourtesy of Refinitiv XENITH

IYT is 25.5% above its 2018 low of $155.24 set on Dec. 24. The ETF is 7% below its all-time intraday high of $209.43 set on Sept. 14. The 2019 high of $200.42 was set on April 24.

The weekly chart for IYT is positive with the ETF above its five-week MMA at $189.51 with its 12x3x3 weekly slow stochastic reading rising to 59.46 last week, up from 52.44 on July 19. Its monthly value level is $186.61 with a semiannual pivot at $193.47, and annual and quarterly risky levels at $196.35 and $200.49, respectively.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA:IWM)

Daily Chart For IWMCourtesy of Refinitiv XENITH

IWM is 25% above its 2018 low of $125.81 set on Dec. 26 and is 9.3% below its all-time intraday high of $173.39 set on Aug. 31. The 2019 high is $161.11 set on May 6. The Russell 2000 is above its 200-day simple moving average at $151.23.

IWM has a positive weekly chart with the ETF above its five-week MMA at $154.84. Its 12x3x3 weekly slow stochastic reading rose to 61.21 last week, up from 58.92 on July 19. The monthly value level is $152.33 with semiannual and annual pivots at $156.14 and $157.49, respectively, and quarterly risky level at $166.36.

How to use my value levels and risky levels:

Value levels and risky levels are based upon the last nine weekly, monthly, quarterly, semiannual and annual closes. The first set of levels was based upon the closes on Dec. 31. The original annual level remains in play. The weekly level changes each week. The monthly level was changed at the end of each month, the latest on June 28. The quarterly level was changed at the end of June. My theory is that nine years of volatility between closes are enough to assume that all possible bullish or bearish events for the stock are factored in. To capture share price volatility, investors should buy on weakness to a value level and reduce holdings on strength to a risky level. A pivot is a value level or risky level that was violated within its time horizon. Pivots act as magnets that have a high probability of being tested again before its time horizon expires.

How to use 12x3x3 Weekly Slow Stochastic Readings:

My choice of using 12x3x3 weekly slow stochastic readings was based upon back-testing many methods of reading share-price momentum with the objective of finding the combination that resulted in the fewest false signals. I did this following the stock market crash of 1987, so I have been happy with the results for more than 30 years. The stochastic reading covers the last 12 weeks of highs, lows and closes for the stock. There is a raw calculation of the differences between the highest high and lowest low versus the closes. These levels are modified to a fast reading and a slow reading and I found that the slow reading worked the best. The stochastic reading scales between 00.00 and 100.00, with readings above 80.00 considered overbought and readings below 20.00 considered oversold. Recently, I noted that stocks tend to peak and decline 10% to 20% and more shortly after a reading rises above 90.00, so I call that an “inflating parabolic bubble” as a bubble always pops. I also call a reading below 10.00 as being “too cheap to ignore.”

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

[ad_2]

Source link Google News

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy